As an attorney and religion buff, that is a very interesting question. It would seem that an atheist would be benefited under such a policy. For example, your house is destroyed by a hurricane. The policy will not reimburse for damages due to acts of God. The athiest says, there is no God, therefore, there the damages were not caused by acts of God and must be covered under some other provision of the policy, right? You might need an athiest insurance agent to make sure you can cover such events. Hmmmm. Good question.
|